Why did Toyota hybrid battery prices increase so much in 2025?

Suddenly, without warning, the prices for Toyota hybrid batteries nearly doubled for Prius model years 2004 to 2009, and 2010 to 2015. Many of our customers who were quoted prices in 2024 for HV battery replacement but wanted to save up for a little while before getting the work done were shocked when they came back, as were we.

So, why did Toyota increase the prices for the HV batteries so substantially? Let’s start by listing some of the theories and then going through them one by one.

  • Toyota’s costs associated with producing NiMH batteries increased significantly
  • Trump’s threat of tariffs on Chinese goods made it necessary to increase prices since most batteries are manufactured in China
  • Costs associated with new environmental regulations regarding batteries are being passed down to the consumer
  • Toyota has been subsidizing HV battery replacement to build acceptance of hybrid vehicles. This has been accomplished and they’re no longer willing to spend money on it.
  • Toyota wants you to buy a new vehicle so they’re making the decision easier for you.

Increased battery manufacturing costs?

I’m an auto mechanic. I have no expertise in business or manufacturing, so I’m not qualified to speak about manufacturing cost for NiMH batteries. I’ll do what I always do when I need the answer to a question I’m not expert in, check Perplexity. Here’s what it said (you can click on the citations for a link to the source material):

There is no strong evidence in the provided sources to confirm a significant increase in NiMH (nickel-metal hydride) battery production costs that would directly explain Toyota’s hybrid battery price hikes in January 2025. Here’s an analysis of the relevant findings:

Key Findings on NiMH Battery Costs

  1. General Market Trends:
    • The global NiMH battery market is growing due to demand in automotive and other applications, but there is no clear indication of a sharp rise in production costs. Instead, advancements in technology and manufacturing efficiency are expected to improve cost-effectiveness over time (1).
  2. Raw Material Costs:
    • Nickel prices, a key component of NiMH batteries, have seen some fluctuations, but there is no clear evidence of a dramatic cost increase in 2024 or early 2025 (1). In fact, the nickel market is projected to remain in surplus for 2025, which suggests stable or even declining costs for this material (2).
  3. Competitiveness with Lithium-Ion Batteries:
    • NiMH batteries face competition from lithium-ion batteries, which have been experiencing significant price declines due to technological advancements and falling raw material costs (3). This competitive pressure could make it harder for NiMH battery prices to rise significantly without losing market share.
  4. Environmental and Regulatory Factors:
    • Some sources mention environmental regulations and tariffs as potential cost drivers for battery production1, but there is no detailed data showing how these factors specifically impacted NiMH battery costs.

Conclusion

While Toyota’s hybrid battery price increases could theoretically be influenced by higher production costs, the available data does not support a significant rise in NiMH battery production expenses as the primary driver. Instead, other factors—such as Toyota’s pricing strategy, market positioning, or supply chain adjustments—may better explain the price hikes.

Trump’s Tariff’s?

Okay so it doesn’t look like an increase manufacturing costs are a likely candidate for a doubling in nickel metal hydride battery prices. What about Trump’s tariffs? Is that what might have caused Toyota to double its battery prices? Once again, I’m a mechanic and know nothing about international trade, so here we go with Perplexity again.

Trump’s tariffs and tariff threats could potentially affect the prices of nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries imported from China, but the impact is likely to be indirect and less significant compared to their effect on lithium-ion batteries. Here’s an analysis based on the available information:

Tariffs and Their Potential Impact on NiMH Batteries

  1. Existing Tariffs on Battery Imports:
    • The U.S. has imposed various tariffs on Chinese imports under Section 301, with rates for lithium-ion batteries increasing from 7.5% to 25% in 2024 and potentially higher under new proposals. However, NiMH batteries are not explicitly mentioned in these tariff schedules, suggesting they may not face the same level of direct tariff increases as lithium-ion batteries (1).
  2. Broader Trade Barriers:
    • Tariffs on raw materials like steel, aluminum, and other battery components could indirectly increase the cost of manufacturing NiMH batteries in China. For example, Section 232 tariffs on imported industrial materials, such as aluminum used in battery casings, remain in place and could contribute to higher production costs (2).
  3. Supply Chain Disruptions:
    • The uncertainty surrounding U.S.-China trade relations and potential revocation of China’s Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status could increase costs across the board for Chinese-manufactured goods, including NiMH batteries. If broader tariffs or duties are applied to battery components or related materials, this could further raise costs (3).
  4. Shift in Market Dynamics:
    • While lithium-ion batteries dominate the global battery market, NiMH batteries are still used in hybrid vehicles like older Toyota Prius models. If tariffs make Chinese lithium-ion batteries less competitive, manufacturers might focus more on alternative chemistries like NiMH, potentially increasing demand and prices for these batteries.

Conclusion

Although there is no direct evidence that Trump’s tariffs specifically target NiMH batteries, broader trade policies affecting raw materials and manufacturing costs in China could indirectly increase their prices. However, the impact is likely to be smaller compared to the significant price hikes seen for lithium-ion batteries due to their dominant role in energy storage and electric vehicles.

Was the price increase caused by new environmental regulations?

It looks like the NiMH batteries used in the Gen2 and Gen3 Prius aren’t really affected by the change in tariff policy. Could the increase in price be caused by some recent onerous environmental regulation? In addition to being a professional hybrid mechanic, I’m also an expert in an environmental regulation. Just kidding. I do know a bit about it because it’s part of this business, but this is another job for Perplexity.

Considering only regulations that affect the U.S. market, there are no recent or imminent federal environmental regulations specifically targeting nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries that would directly increase their costs in early 2025. However, broader regulatory trends and state-level initiatives could indirectly influence costs. Here’s an overview:

Federal Regulations

  1. Universal Waste Rule (RCRA):
    • Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), certain batteries, including nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) and small sealed lead-acid batteries, are classified as universal waste to streamline their recycling and disposal. However, NiMH batteries are not explicitly covered under this rule, meaning they may still be subject to general hazardous waste management rules in some cases (1).
    • The EPA is working on updates to the universal waste rule, but these changes primarily focus on lithium-ion batteries and solar panels, with no immediate impact on NiMH batteries expected until at least mid-2025 (2).
  2. Battery Recycling Best Practices:
    • The EPA is developing a report on best practices for battery collection and recycling, which could influence future regulations. However, this initiative is still in its early stages and does not impose new requirements on NiMH battery manufacturers or sellers as of January 2025 (3).
  3. Critical Material Supply Concerns:
    • NiMH batteries rely on rare earth elements (REEs) like neodymium and nickel, which are considered critical materials by the U.S. government. While there are no specific federal restrictions or cost-increasing mandates for NiMH battery production, supply chain pressures due to REE scarcity could indirectly raise costs6.

State-Level Regulations

  1. Battery Stewardship Laws:
    • Some states, such as Minnesota and New Jersey, have implemented extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws requiring manufacturers to establish recycling programs for rechargeable batteries. These laws primarily target nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd) and lead-acid batteries but may also apply to NiMH batteries in certain contexts23.
    • For example, Minnesota prohibits the sale of rechargeable batteries unless the manufacturer has a state-approved recycling program in place3. Compliance with such laws could add logistical and administrative costs for companies selling NiMH batteries.
  2. Recycling Efficiency Targets:
    • States like Illinois are advancing legislation to improve battery recycling efficiency rates (e.g., 60% for rechargeable batteries). While these laws do not yet mandate specific recycling rates for NiMH batteries, they could lead to higher costs if similar requirements are extended to this chemistry in the future5.

Conclusion

At present, there are no significant federal or state environmental regulations directly increasing the cost of selling NiMH hybrid vehicle batteries in the U.S. market as of January 2025. However:

  • State-level EPR laws and recycling mandates may impose indirect compliance costs.
  • Broader supply chain issues related to rare earth elements used in NiMH batteries could contribute to higher production costs.

The regulatory landscape remains dynamic, but most current efforts focus on lithium-ion batteries rather than NiMH chemistries.

Because Toyota wanted to

There’s no way to prove the remaining two possibilities short of Toyota coming out with a press release explaining their motive.

It may be that Toyota wants you to buy a new Toyota and is tired of you fixing your 20 year old Prius.

Or it could be the Toyota was subsidizing battery replacement to make hybrids seem more attractive to buyers, which honestly seems fairly unlikely. Very few buyers actually do research on replacement costs before purchasing a vehicle. Also, that would be quite the long game for Toyota, since they offered a 10-year warranty on the battery when car was new.

So why did Toyota do it? Well for one they can make a lot more money, some might say an obscene amount of money, for every new battery they sell. Secondly, if you’re inclined to buy a hybrid—which is currently a far better option than buying an EV, especially if you’re concerned about battery price—Toyota has the best hybrid platform on the market today. It’s pretty good gamble people will buy a new Toyota hybrids if they want a hybrid.

Will it backfire and create a backlash within the hybrid-buying community, or will people have little sympathy for owners of 10-20 year old cars faced with an expensive repair. Time will tell.

Under new management?

When I started writing this article I didn’t consider that there might have been some leadership changes at Toyota. As it turns out, there has been. Once again, Perplexity:

Yes, there have been recent management shifts at Toyota, including in departments relevant to parts pricing in the U.S. market. Here are the key changes:

Relevant Management Changes

  1. Ryan Grimm Succeeds Robert Young in Parts Procurement:
    • On December 2, 2024, Ryan Grimm was appointed Group Vice President of Purchasing Supplier Development at Toyota Motor North America (TMNA), succeeding Robert Young, who is retiring in March 2025. This role oversees vehicle parts and materials procurement, supplier development, and preparation for TMNA operations (1).
    • Grimm has extensive experience in parts procurement and supply chain operations, having worked at Toyota since 1998. His new leadership could influence pricing strategies for hybrid vehicle components, including batteries.
  2. Stephen Brennan’s Expanded Role in Battery Supply Chain:
    • Effective January 1, 2025, Stephen Brennan, Group Vice President and Executive Engineering Officer at TMNA, took on additional responsibilities for advanced planning of Toyota’s North American battery and electric vehicle supply chain. He also continues to oversee production engineering (2).
    • This expanded role suggests a focus on optimizing battery supply chains, which could indirectly affect battery pricing.
  3. Susan Elkington’s New Sustainability Role:
    • Susan Elkington transitioned from Senior Vice President of Electric Vehicle Supply to Executive Technical Advisor for Toyota Global and North American Sustainability as of January 1, 2025. Her focus on sustainability could influence cost structures related to environmentally compliant parts like hybrid batteries (3).
  4. Mark Templin Named COO of TMNA:
    • Mark Templin will assume the role of Chief Operating Officer (COO) of TMNA on January 27, 2025, succeeding Jack Hollis. While this change is broader in scope, Templin’s leadership may shape overall operational strategies that include pricing policies (4).

Potential Impact on Pricing

These changes bring new leadership perspectives to critical areas such as parts procurement and the battery supply chain. Specifically:

  • Grimm’s appointment may lead to shifts in supplier negotiations or cost management strategies for hybrid vehicle components.
  • Brennan’s expanded role in battery supply chain planning could reflect efforts to address rising costs or improve efficiency in sourcing materials for NiMH and other batteries.
  • Elkington’s sustainability focus may prioritize compliance with environmental regulations, potentially influencing costs associated with sustainable production or recycling initiatives.

While these shifts do not directly confirm a link to recent price increases for hybrid batteries, they suggest a strategic realignment within Toyota that could have downstream effects on parts pricing in the U.S. market.

Other reading